Peer review

Peer Review Process

Peer Review Evaluation

Articles submitted to FACCEA undergo a double-blind peer review system, ensuring impartiality and scientific quality. Evaluation criteria include originality, relevance, timeliness, academic rigor, and compliance with author guidelines.

The review process consists of the following stages:

  • Accepted: The article meets all requirements and proceeds to copyediting.

  • Accepted with Revisions: The author must address reviewer comments. Depending on the revisions, the article may be accepted, sent to a third arbitrator, or rejected.

  • Rejected: If the reviewers determine the article does not meet quality standards, no appeal will be considered.

To ensure transparency, the submission and acceptance dates are included for each published article.

Article Classification

Articles published in FACCEA fall into the following categories:

  • Scientific Research Article: Presents original research findings, including introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusions.

  • Reflection Article: Offers a critical, analytical, and interpretive perspective on a specific topic, supported by original sources.

  • Review Article: Synthesizes and integrates findings from prior studies, with a minimum of 50 bibliographic references.

Download Peer Review Guidelines