La noción posthumanista de la cognición
Palabras clave:
cognición corporizada, cognición enactiva, post-humanismo, excepcionalidad humana, origen evolutivo de la cogniciónResumen
A pesar del importante auge que han tenido discusiones sobre el posthumanismo en la última década, poco se ha dicho sobre su perspectiva acerca de la cognición. En este sentido, el propósito del presente documento es estudiar la propuesta post-humanista de la cognición. La tesis a probar es que dicha propuesta se constituye a partir de la conjunción de tres elementos: la cognición corporizada, el enactivismo y el origen evolutivo de la mente, elementos que surgen en el momento en el que el post-humanismo se propone dejar atrás al humanismo y sus ideas de excepcionalidad humana. De esta manera, la noción post-humanista de la cognición surge, precisamente de la crítica a la excepcionalidad humana.
Descargas
Referencias
Allen, C., & Bekoff, M. (1999). Species of Mind: The Philosophy and Biology of Cognitive Ethology. The MIT Press.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Polity
Carroll, J. (2017). Eighteenth‐Century Departures From Dualism: From Mechanism And Animism To Vitalism And Anthropology. German Life and Letters, 70(4), 430-444.
Castoriadis, C. (1999). L’institution imaginaire de la société. Le Seuil.
Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511703829
De Waal, F. (2006). Primates and Philosophers. How Morality Evolved. Princeton University Press
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2009). A thousand plateaus: rhizomes. Berkeley, CA: Venus Pencils
Ferrando, F. (2013). The Posthuman: Philosophical Posthumanism and Its Others [PhDThesis]. Universitá di Roma Tre.
Ferrando, F. (2019). Philosophical Posthumanism. Bloomsbury.
François, A. (2018). The figuration of post-human bodies: A processual experiment with imaginaries. Imago, 12(7), 25-38
Glock, H.-J. (2012). The Anthropological Difference: What Can Philosophers Do To Identify
the Differences Between Human and Nonhuman Animals? 70, 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/
Graham, E. (2002). Representations of the post/human: Monsters, aliens and others in popular
culture. Rutgers University Press.
Haraway, D. (1991). Donna Haraway, “A Cyborg Manifesto : Nature, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-009-0120-4
Hassan, I. (1987). The postmodern turn: essays in postmodern theory and culture. Ohio State University Press: Columbus
Hassan, I. (1977). Prometheus as Performer: Toward a Posthumanist Culture? The Georgia Review, 31(4), 830–850.
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we Became Posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature,
and informaticcs. University of Chicago Press.
Latour, B. (2008). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford:
Oxford Univ. Press.
Landgraf, E., Trop, G., & Weatherby, L. (Eds.). (2019). Posthumanism in the Age of Humanism.
Bloomsbury.
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393. doi:10.1007/bf01059830
Lettvin, J. Y., Maturana, H., McCulloch, W.S., & Pitts, W. H. (1959). What the Frog’s EyeTells the Frog’s Brain. Proceedings of the IRE, 47(11), 1940-1951.
MacCormack, P. (2012). Posthuman Ethics: Embodiment and Cultural Theory. Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition. Reidel Publishing
Nayar, P. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity Press.
Pepperell, R. (2003). The Posthuman Condition. Intellect.
Sharon, T. (2014). Human Nature in an Age of Biotechnology: The Case for Mediated Posthumanism. Springer
Tegmark, M. (2007). The Mathematical Universe. Foundation of Physics
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch,E. (1991). The Embodied Mind. Philosophical Books, 6(3), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0149.1965.tb01386.x
Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.
