Forage resources for cattle production systems in the department of Caquetá

History of livestock farming in Caqueta, Nutrition in livestock systems in the Amazonian foothills, Nutritional quality of tree species in the Amazonian foothills

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47847/

Keywords:

Amazonian, Livestock, Nutrition, Forage potential, production systems

Abstract

Livestock farming in the Amazon foothills is characterized by traditional management, where large areas of forest are converted into pastures for animal feed, giving rise to livestock farms with low productive and reproductive parameters due to poor nutrition, in addition to generating environmental effects due to the lack of knowledge that ranchers have about the benefits provided by natural resources, in this sense it is important to opt for management strategies on the different tree species with forage potential as an alternative to recover production systems, for this reason for the development of this work it was carried out through a systematic search of related scientific articles, in addition for a better understanding a table was made with information compiled about the nutritional quality of the different species with forage potential in tropical conditions in order to analyze which species with forage potential can be implemented in the bovine production systems of Caquetá.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adrizal, Pazla, R., Sriagtula, R., Adrinal, & Gusmini. (2021). Evaluation of potential and local forages nutrition as ruminant feed-in Payo Agro-Tourism Area, Solok City, West Sumatera, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 888(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/888/1/012055

Alcívar, M. A. M., Larrea, C. O. I., & Hurtado, H. A. (2023). Physical-chemical characterization and nutritional assessment of the hatchery plant (Trichanthera gigantea) as an alternative raw material for animal feed.

Alfonso, F. J., Fredy, M., Vega, R., & Ligia, M. (2016). Rev Sist Prod Agroecol. 4: 1: 2013 2 Calidad nutricional y degradabilidad de tres especies de árboles forrajeros utilizando vacas fistuladas Determination of the nutritional quality and degradability of fodder trees species using fistulated cows.

Álvarez, F. C., Casanoves, F., Medina, Y. C., Meneses, J. F. O., Martinez, V. J. B., & Parra, G. A. C. (2022). Nutritional quality of Piptocoma discolor and Cratylia argentea as a non-timber forest products for animal feed in the Caquetá province. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development, 116(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.36253/JAEID-13102

Argüello, R. J., Mahecha, L. L., & Angulo, A. J. (2019). Fodder shrubs: Relevance in cattle systems of Colombian low altitude lands. Agronomia Mesoamericana, 30(3), 899–915. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v30i3.35136

Arias. R, J, L., Delgado, E., & Mireles, S. (2018). Studies of the nutritive value of Albizia lebbeck (L) Benth foliage through its in vitro digestibility. January, 30, 1–12.

Avilez, R. R., Barón, B. O., Alcalá, R. J., Salinas, C. J., Flores, N. M., & Ruiz, A. M. (2022). Deficiências nutricionais que afetam a retomada da ciclicidade pós-parto em bovinos de dupla finalidade. Abanico Veterinario, 12. https://doi.org/10.21929/abavet2022.251

Aye PA. (2016). AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FOOD AND NUTRITION Comparative nutritive value of Moringa oleifera, Tithonia diversifolia and Gmelina arborea leaf meals. https://doi.org/10.5251/ajfn.2016.6.1.23.32

Bedoya, E. O. C. (2022). Livestock, Population and Deforestation of the Caqueteño Amazonian Ecosystems (1951-1980). Historia Ambiental Latinoamericana y Caribena, 12(2), 140–169. https://doi.org/10.32991/2237-2717.2022v12i2.p140-169

Capdevilla, D. A. G., Bermúdez, O. B., & Aguirre, M. A. (2023). Community Alternatives to Deforestation Processes in the Colombian Amazon. Case el Caraño, Caquetá. Historia Ambiental Latinoamericana y Caribena, 13(1), 19–52. https://doi.org/10.32991/2237-2717.2023v13i1.p19-52

Carrillo, F. Á., Casanoves, F., Medina, Y. C., Meneses, J. F. O., Martinez, V. J. B., & Parra, G. A. C. (2022). Nutritional quality of Piptocoma discolor and Cratylia argentea as a non-timber forest products for animal feed in the Caquetá province. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development, 116(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.36253/JAEID-13102

Castañeda, N. P. Á., Álvarez, F., Arango, J., Chachy, L., García, G., Sánchez, V., Solarte, M., & Zapata, C. (2016). Especies vegetales útiles para sistemas silvopastoriles del Caquetá, Colombia. www.ciat.cgiar.org

Castro, M. J. M., & Dickhoefer, U. (2020). The nutritional value of tropical legume forages fed to ruminants as affected by their growth habit and fed form: A systematic review. In Animal Feed Science and Technology (Vol. 269). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114641

Contreras, S. J. L., Martínez-Atencia, J., & Falla-Guzman, C. K. (2021). Carbono acumulado en raíces de especies vegetales en sistemas silvopastoriles en el Norte de Colombia. Revista de Ciencias Ambientales, 55(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.15359/rca.55-1.3

Del Prado, A., Galán, E., Batalla, I., & Pardo, G. (2020). Impacts and adaptations to climate change in ruminants. ITEA Informacion Tecnica Economica Agraria, 116(5), 461–482. https://doi.org/10.12706/itea.2020.038

Echevarría, M., Pizarro, D., Gómez, C., & Nacional, P. (2019). ALIMENTACIÓN DE GANADERÍA EN SISTEMAS SILVOPASTORILES DE LA AMAZONIA PERUANA-INIA-PNIA/UPMSI/IE. https://doi.org/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335542022

Fonseca, R. C., Angulo, C. F., & Piedrahita, M. J. F. (2023). Alternativas agroecológicas para la resiliencia de especies forrajeras frente al cambio climático Agroecological alternatives for forage species resilience against climate change (Vol. 8, Issue 1). Enero-Junio.

Galloso, H. M. A., Rodríguez, E. V., Alvarez-Díaz, C. A., Soca-Perez, M., Dublin, D. R., Iglesias-Gómez, J., & Guelmes, L. S. (2020). Selectivity of Leguminous Trees by Water Buffaloes in Semi-intensive Systems. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.542338

Gamarra, C., Díaz Lezcano, M. I., Vera de Ortíz, M., Galeano, M. D. P., & Cabrera Cardús, A. J. N. (2018). Relación carbono-nitrógeno en suelos de sistemas silvopastoriles del Chaco paraguayo. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 9(46). https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v9i46.134

Gaviria, U. X., Bolivar, D. M., Rosenstock, T. S., Molina, B. I. C., Chirinda, N., Barahona, R., & Arango, J. (2020). Nutritional Quality, Voluntary Intake and Enteric Methane Emissions of Diets Based on Novel Cayman Grass and Its Associations With Two Leucaena Shrub Legumes. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.579189

Giraldo, N. V., & Chará, J. (2022). Efecto de los sistemas silvopastoriles intensivos en la reducción de la degradación física y biológica del suelo. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 34, Article #17, 3(17).

Gomes, J. P. de M., Campana, M., Gregorini, P., Garcia, T. M., Minussi, J. F. de A., Pereira, S. N., Pereira, F. C., & Del Valle, T. A. (2023). In Vitro Evaluation of Potentially Edible Brazilian Trees and Shrubs in Ruminant Nutrition. Animals, 13(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13233703

Gonda, H. L., Valdivié, M., & Martínez, Y. (2022). Hibiscus rosa-sinensis Forage as a Potential Feed for Animals: A Review. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani

González, Q. R., van Wijk, M. T., Ruden, A., Gómez, M., Pantevez, H., Castro-Llanos, F., Notenbaert, A., & Arango, J. (2022). Yield gap analysis to identify attainable milk and meat productivities and the potential for greenhouse gas emissions mitigation in cattle systems of Colombia. Agricultural Systems, 195, 103303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103303

Guadalupe, M., Ochoa, J. N., Fernando, A., Olivera, P., Ramos, B. G., Trujillo Pahua, V., De Jesús, I., Maldonado, D., Oviedo Boyso, J., Delgado, V. S., María, R., & Bravo, R. (2024). ADAPTATION OF TREE LEGUMES IN A SILVOPASTORAL SYSTEM FOR SHEEP IN A TEMPERATE CLIMATE Información del artículo. https://doi.org/10.51

Hernández, A. X., Ortiz, G. S., Vivas-, A. W. F., Fernández-Romay, Y., O-León, O. La, Pérez-Márquez, S., Luiz-Abdalla, A., & Ledea-Rodríguez, J. L. (2024). NUTRITIONAL VALUE AND IN VITRO DRY MATTER DEGRADABILITY IN MEXICAN SUNFLOWER: Tithonia diversifolia Helms (Gray). Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.5211

Hernández, M. J., Sánchez, S. P., Torres, S. N., Herrera, P. J., Rojas, G. A. R., Reyes, V. I., & Mendoza, N. M. A. (2018). Composición química y degradaciones in vitro de vainas y hojas de leguminosas arbóreas del trópico seco de México. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 9(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v9i1.4332

Ibarra, R. A. J., Fragoso, C. P. J., Giraldo, V. L. A., & Mojica, R. J. E. (2022). Effect of tropical forage species in silvopastoral arrangements on methane production and in vitro fermentation parameters in a RUSITEC system. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 35(4), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v35n4a02

Lemes, A. P., Garcia, A. R., Pezzopane, J. R. M., Brandão, F. Z., Watanabe, Y. F., Cooke, R. F., Sponchiado, M., de Paz, C. C. P., Camplesi, A. C., Binelli, M., & Gimenes, L. U. (2021). Silvopastoral system is an alternative to improve animal welfare and productive performance in meat production systems. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93609-7

Lista, F. N., Deminicis, B. B., De Carvalho Almeida, J. C., Do Carmo Araujo, S. A., & Zanella, P. G. (2019). Forage production and quality of tropical forage legumes submitted to shading. Ciencia Rural, 49(7). https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20170726

Martínez, F. F., Guerrero, R. J. de D., López, O. S., Aceves, R. E., Olvera, H. J. I., & Méndez, E. J. A. (2023). YIELD AND NUTRITIONAL VALUE OF HERBACEOUS LEGUMES NATIVE TO MEXICO WITH FORAGE POTENTIAL IN THE DRY TROPICS. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 46(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2023.2.95

Martínez, R. A. T., Chillito, M. M. A., Mota, P. A. D., Rojas-Vargas, E. P., Santamaría Galindo, Y., & Herrera-Valencia, W. (2024). Efecto de modelos silvopastoriles sobre la producción de leche en bovinos de la Montañita, Caquetá, Colombia.

Mayberry, D., Hau, D. K., Dida, P. R., Bria, D., Praing, J., Mata, A. D., Budisantoso, E., Dalgliesh, N., Quigley, S., Bell, L., & Nulik, J. (2021). Herbaceous legumes provide several options for increasing beef cattle productivity in eastern Indonesia. Animal Production Science, 61(7), 698–707. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20545

Motta, G., & Pascua, I. Di. (2024). Evolución histórica de la contribución de la ganadería al cambio climático. Un análisis de las estimaciones de FAO entre 2006 y 2023.

Muñoz, E. M., Paola, A., Lavado, F., Montenegro Calvo, M. J., Ugarte, M. G., Azabache, O. F., Escobar, M. M., Juliana, M., Calvo, M., Subdirector, J. R., De, D., Ítica Ambiental - Ufz, P., Sunderhaus, S., Castañeda, C. R., Montenegro, M. J., Andrea, C., Fernández, P., Anne, L., Citación, W., … Ugarte, G. (2022). Hacia una ganadería sostenible en Vichada. Instrumentos políticos y financieros Contribuciones Centro de Investigaciones Ambientales UFZ ASESORA-GIZ Edición.

Narváez, H. J. P., Angulo, A. J., Barragán, H. W., & Mahecha, L. L. (2023a). Shrubs and trees of the Colombian Amazonian foothills: Nutritional and environmental potential in livestock systems. In Agronomia Mesoamericana (Vol. 34, Issue 3). Universidad de Costa Rica. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.2023.52442

Nava, R. M. (2023). Sustainability and financial performance in Dual Purpose Livestock Systems: A comprehensive approach to agroecological perspectives (Vol. 8, Issue 2). https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9328-4353

Núñez, A. J. M., Jiménez, C. J. P., Tobía, R. C. M., Arias, G. L. M., Jiménez, A. E., & Padilla, F. J. E. (2022). Efecto de la edad de rebrote y época del año sobre los componentes de la pared celular y la digestibilidad in vitro de gramíneas (II PARTE). Nutrición Animal Tropical, 16(2), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.15517/nat.v16i2.52729

Ochoa, D. K. G., Diaz, M. C. L., & Pacheco, E. A. P. (2023). Effect of dietary supplementation with forage species Trichanthera gigantea (Bonpl.) Nees y Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A. Gray on the milk production. https://doi.org/ConcludingforthepresentstudythatthespeciesrecommendedforthezonecouldbeTrichantheragigantea.Keywords:SustainableLivestockHusbandry,FodderBanks,EcuadorianAmazon,yield.

Ochoa, D. K., & Valerezco, J. M. G. (2014). Caracterización y análisis de rentabilidad de los sistemas de producción ganaderos presentes en el cantón Yantzaza, Ecuador.

Olarte, I. Y. H., Herrera, W. V., Martínez, R. A. T., Medina, E. J. M., Motta, P. A. D., & Toledo, V. (2022). EFECTO DE LA PRODUCCIÓN FORRAJERA DE PASTURAS NATIVAS E INTRODUCIDAS SOBRE LA PRODUCCIÓN DE LECHE EN LA AMAZONIA COLOMBIANA. Revista Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias -FAGROPEC, 14(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.47847/fagropec.v14n1a1

Olomonchi, E. O. A., Garipoglu, A. V., Ocak, N., & Kamalak, A. (2022). Nutritional values and in vitro fermentation parameters of some fodder species found in two rangeland areas in the Republic of Benin. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 46(1), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-2101-69

Ontivero, Y. V. (2021). Characterization of five promising protein shrubs for the Cuban animal husbandry (Vol. 44). https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3558-1552

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. In The BMJ (Vol. 372). BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pardo, Y. Y. R., Andrade, M. C. A., & Hernández, O. C. (2021). Competitividad y sustentabilidad en sistemas ganaderos del piedemonte Amazónico Colombiano. 21.

Patiño, Q. B., Arbey Martínez Ortega, C., Ernesto Baldrich Romero, N., Quiroz, P., Ortega, M., Romero, B., & Ortega, M. (2021). Livestock farming in silvopastoral production systems REVISTA FAGROPEC Artículo de Revisión Cómo citar: Este artículo puede compartirse bajo la Licencia Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0). Rev. FAGROPEC, 13(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.47847/fagropec

Pazla, R., Zain, M., Despal, Tanuwiria, U. H., Putri, E. M., Makmur, M., Zahera, R., Sari, L. A., Afnan, I. M., Rosmalia, A., Yulianti, Y. I., Putri, S. D., Mushawwir, A., & Apriliana, R. A. (2023). Evaluation of Rumen Degradable Protein Values from Various Tropical Foliages Using in Vitro and in Situ Methods. International Journal of Veterinary Science, 12(6), 860–868. https://doi.org/10.47278/journal.ijvs/2023.045

Pérez, E. F. F., & Ramo, E. V. C. (2022). Investigacion universitaria: Impacto productivo de la ganaderia sostenible en Colombia. Articule, 125–305.

Pérez, G. E. C., Albores-Moreno, S., Sanginés-García, J., Aguilar-Urquizo, E., Chay-Canul, A., Canul-Solis, J., Muñoz-Gonzalez, J., Diaz-Echeverria, V., Trinidad Piñero-Vázquez, A., Nacional de México, T., Zona Maya, I. T., Roo, Q., & de correspondencia Resumen, A. (2020). Degradability and in vitro methane production of tree and shrub foliage with potential in ruminant nutrition. http://doi.org/10.15174.au.2020.2840

Piedad, M., Restrepo, V., Ortiz Grisales, S., Londoño Hernández, L., García, A. V., & Alejandra Ordóñez Narváez, G. (2023). Characterization of sagu leaves and rhizomes Maranta arundinacea (l.). https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9594-0289

Quiñones, J. D. C., Cardina, J. L. C., & Castro, E. R. (2020). Revista de Investigaciones Altoandinas Ensilaje de arbustivas forrajeras para sistemas de alimentación ganadera del trópico altoandino Fodder shrub silage for livestock feeding systems in the high Andean tropics. Rev. Investig. Altoandin, 22, 3–285. https://doi.org/10.18271/ria.2020.662

Riascos, A., Galindo, J. L., Herrera, M., Medina, Y., & Narváez, J. P. H. (2021). Selección nutritiva de forrajeras locales del pie de monte amazónico, Departamento del Putumayo, Colombia. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd33/2/jupan3321.html

Riascos, A., Reyes, G. J. J., & Mendoza, L. A. A. (2020). Nutritional characterization of trees from the Amazonian piedmont, Putumayo department, Colombia Caracterización nutritiva de arbóreas del pie de monte amazónico, departamento del Putumayo, Colombia. In Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science (Vol. 54, Issue 2). https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6627-9372

Rincón, J. D. C., & Moreno, E. J. R. (2022). IMPORTANCIA DEL FRACCIONAMIENTO DE LOS CARBOHIDRATOS Y PROTEÍNAS EN LA DIETA SUMINISTRADA A VACAS LECHERAS.

Rivera, J. E., Ruíz, T. E., Chará, J., Gómez-Leyva, J. F., & Barahona, R. (2021). Biomass production and nutritional properties of promising genotypes of Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A. Gray under different environments. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales, 9(3), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.17138/TGFT(9)280-291

Romero, M. A., Tzec-Gamboa, M., Álvarez-Rivera, O. O., Ramírez y Avilés, L., & Solorio-Sánchez, F. J. (2024). Los sistemas silvopastoriles y las barreras socio-ecológicas que limitan su adopción. Bioagrociencias, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.56369/bac.5402

Salcedo, G. W. (2019). Sistemas Silvopastoriles: Una mirada rápida a los arreglos, masificación y experiencia en TERRITORIALIDADES EMERGENTES. www.idesmac.org.mx

Sandoval, D., Flórez, J. F. H., Enciso, K., & Sotelo, M. E. (2022). Evaluacion-economica-y-ambiental-de-un-sistema-silvopastoril-en-Colombia-una-perspectiva-desde-los-servicios-ecosistemicos. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367268871

Santos, K. C., Magalhães, A. L. R., Silva, D. K. A., Araújo, G. G. L., Fagundes, G. M., Ybarra, N. G., & Abdalla, A. L. (2017). Nutritional potential of forage species found in Brazilian Semiarid region. Livestock Science, 195, 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.12.002

Silva Ruiz, L., & Jaramillo Peralta, D. A. (2022). Manejo Sostenible de la ganadería en Latinoamérica: Revisión Sistemática 2018-2021. Ambiente, Comportamiento y Sociedad, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.51343/racs.v5i1.969

Soliva, C. R., Zeleke, A. B., Clément, C., Hess, H. D., Fievez, V., & Kreuzer, M. (2018). In vitro screening of various tropical foliages, seeds, fruits and medicinal plants for low methane and high ammonia generating potentials in the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 147(1–3), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.09.009

Torres, P. P., Alfonso, V., Andrade, L., Javier, H., & Valencia, B. (2019). Competitividad de la ganadería doble propósito en el municipio de Florencia, Caquetá.

Uvidia, H. A. C., Arias, P., Reyes-Silva, F. D., & Herrera-Feijoo, R. J. (2024). Análisis de los bancos de proteína en la alimentación de la ganadería lechera en el Ecuador. Código Científico Revista de Investigación, 5(1), 487–501. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/ccri/v5/n1/395

Valencia, S. S. S., Jiménez, F. G., Arango, J., Molina, B. I., Chirinda, N., Piñeiro, V. A., Jiménez, O. R., Nahed, T. J., & Kú-Vera, J. (2021). Enteric methane mitigation and fermentation kinetics of forage species from Southern Mexico: in vitro screening. Agroforestry Systems, 95(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00585-4

Viennasay, B., & Wanapat, M. (2020). Strategic supplementation of Flemingia silage to enhance rumen fermentation efficiency, microbial protein synthesis and methane mitigation in beef cattle. BMC Veterinary Research, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02703-x

Zapata, C. C. C., García, M. J. E., Salinas, C. J., Ascacio, V. J. A., Medina, M. M. A., & Mellado, M. (2020). Chemical composition and nutritional value of leaves and pods of Leucaena leucocephala, Prosopis laevigata and Acacia farnesiana in a xerophilous shrubland. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 32(10), 723–730. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2020.v32.i10.2148

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

Issue

Section

Artículos de Reflexión

How to Cite

Forage resources for cattle production systems in the department of Caquetá: History of livestock farming in Caqueta, Nutrition in livestock systems in the Amazonian foothills, Nutritional quality of tree species in the Amazonian foothills. (2024). Journal Facultad De Ciencias Agropecuarias - FAGROPEC, 16(2), 74-91. https://doi.org/10.47847/