Does Chilpancingo Have a Walkable Environment? Evaluation of the Built Environment at a Human Scale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47847/Keywords:
environment, interaction with space, habitability, mobilityAbstract
The creation of walkable environments has become crucial due to their benefits for public health, the reduction of sedentary lifestyles, and the environmental impact of motorized transport. This study aimed to assess walkability in the downtown area of Chilpancingo, Guerrero, in order to improve urban mobility and residents’ quality of life. A field data collection instrument was used to gather both quantitative and qualitative information on the physical characteristics of the environment and pedestrian experiences. The results revealed deficiencies in the pedestrian design of downtown Chilpancingo, identifying areas that require attention. Despite these issues, the community shows growing awareness and active participation in urban decision-making. This research provides a detailed diagnosis of current conditions and offers practical recommendations to improve pedestrian infrastructure, promoting more equitable and sustainable urban development.
Downloads
References
Abley, S., Wade-Brown, C., Thomas, L., Linton, L., & Shuttleworth, K. (2010). Guide to undertaking community street reviews. Auckland,: NZ Transport Agency.
Aghaabbasi, M., Moeinaddini, M., Zaly Shah, M., Asadi Shekari, Z., & Kermani, M. A. (2017). Evaluating the capability of walkability audit tools for. Sustainable Cities and Society, 475-484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.001
Arellana, J., Saltarin, M., Larranaga, A. M., & Alvarez, V. (2020). Urban walkability considering pedestrians’ perceptions of the built environment: A 10-year review and a case study in a medium-sized city in Latin America. Transport Reviews, 183-206.
Carruthers, R., Dick, M., & Saurkar, A. (2005). Affordability of Public Transport in developing countries. Transport Papers. Obtenido de https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/pt/230991468153275100/pdf/33900a10TP131affordability1final.pdf
Col.lectiu Punt 6. (2016). Entornos habitables. Obtenido de https://issuu.com/punt6/docs/entornos_habitables_cast_final
Crosby, F., & Hermens, F. (2018). Does it look safe? An eye tracking study into the visual aspects of fear of crime. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1-24. doi:10.1177/1747021818769203
Giles-Corti, B. (2016). City planning and population health: a global challenge. The Lancet, 2912-2924.
Hernández Torres, J. (2006). Organización del espacio urbano en las ciudades medias del estado de Guerrero. Chilpancingo: Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero.
Holden, E., Banister, D., Gössling, S., Gilpin, G., & Linnerud, K. (2020). Grand Narratives for sustainable mobility: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science(65). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101454
INEGI. (2020). Censo de Población y Vivienda. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía . Obtenido de https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ccpv/2020/
ITDP (Instituto de Políticas para el Transporte y el Desarrollo). (2017). El Estándar DOT: Desarrollo Orientado al Transporte v3.0. Nyeva York: ITDP.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
Kaklauskas, A., & Gudauskas, R. (2016). Intelligent decision-support systems and the Internet of Things for the smart built environment. En F. Pacheco-Torgal, Start-Up Creation. The Smart Eco-Efficient Built Environment (págs. 413-449). Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100546-0.00017-0
Kim, D. (2019). The transportation safety of elderly pedestrians: Modeling contributing factors to elderly pedestrian collisions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 131, 268-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.009
Lee, S., Lee, C., Nam, J. W., Abbey-Lambertz, M., & Mendoza, J. A. (2020). School walkability index: Application of environmental audit tool and GIS. Journal of Transport & Health, 18(100880). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.100880
Löwe, R., Mair, M., Pedersen, A., Kleidorfer, M., Rauch, W., & Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K. (2020). Impacts of urban development on urban water management – Limits of predictability. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 84.
Lozano, M. L., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2008). Effect of the Number of Response Categories on the Reliability and Validity of Rating Scales. Methodology, 4(2), 73–79. doi:10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73
Ministerio de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda Urbana. (2021). Guía de Accesibilidad en los espacios públicos urbanizados. Obtenido de https://cdn.mitma.gob.es/portal-web-drupal/estudios_y_publicaciones/guia_accesibilidad.pdf
Montero Bello, J. M. (2018). Impacto de la Movilidad Urbana en la Ciudad de Chilpancingo, Gro. [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero]. Repositorio Institucional UAGro. http://ri.uagro.mx/bitstream/handle/uagro/282/OK14604167_maestria_1.pdf.
Naciones Unidas. (2018). La Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible: una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe. Obtenido de https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40155/24/S1801141_es.pdf
ONU Habitat. (2018). City Prosperity Index.
Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017). Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 710-718. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055
Pucher, J., & Bueheler, R. (2017). Cycling towards a more sustainable transport future. Transport Reviews, 689-694.
Sallis, J. F., Cerin, E., Conway, T. L., Adams, M. A., Frank, L. D., & Pratt, M. (2016). Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01284-2
Secretaría de Desarrollo Agrario, Territorial y Urbano. (2019). Manual de Calles. Diseño vial para ciudades mexicanas. Ciudad e México.
Secretaría de Desarrollo Urbano y Vivienda. (s.f.). Criterios para el orenamiento del Espacio Público. Banquetas. Obtenido de https://transparencia.cdmx.gob.mx/storage/app/uploads/public/59d/987/e69/59d987e691cfa470782142.pdf
Struyf, P. (2020). Fear of the dark. The potential impact of reduced street lighting on crime and fear of crime. En V. Ceccato, & M. K. Nalla, Crime and Fear in Public Places (págs. 347-360). New York: Foutledge.
UN-Habitat. (2020). Streets for Walking and Cycling: Designing for Safety, Accessibility, and Comfort.
United Nations Human Rights. (2021). United Nations. Obtenido de https://www.ohchr.org/en/disabilities
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2021). Understanding crime prevention: Social control, risk, and decision making. United Nations Publications.
Velez, P., & Ashworth, S. D. (2007). The Impact of Item Readability on the Endorsement of the Midpoint. Survey Research Methods, 1(2), 69-74.
Wang, H., & Yang, Y. (2019). Neighbourhood walkability: A review and bibliometric analysis. Cities, 93, 43-61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.015
Wang, T., Harvey, J., & Kendall, A. (2016). Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through strategic management of highway pavement roughness. Environmental Research Letters.
World Health Organization. (2021). Global status report on road safety.
Zuniga-Teran, A. A., Barron, J. O., Randy, G. H., Nader, V. C., Guertin, D. P., & Stuart, E. M. (2017). Neighborhood Design, Physical Activity, and Wellbeing: Applying the Walkability Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 76.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
